Ditto.Lady_Lilith wrote:I do not think tattoos disqualify people from high positions. They will just want them covered. Tattoos are over 5000 years old and recorded everywhere on this planet. People should stop stigmatizing it and judging people by how they look. Same with piercings though I understand they are unsafe for certain positions.
Ouch. lolShekinah wrote:A tattoo for example tags your identity for anyone who might be targeting you and lights up in night-vision scopes. In combat or accidental trauma involving fire a tattoo will absorb flash heat to potentiate burn wounds. In diplomatic circles many otherwise seemingly benign art tattoos may be deemed extremely offensive to foreign observers and may well...get you killed...
I've always been more concerned about this dimension of tatooes, more so than the employment/social/aesthetic aspects. I've always considered tatooes as portals of sorts, points of much unseen energetic activity, kinetic devices that can draw-in, manipulate, transmute, or exude certain energies which resonate with them. That's not always a good thing. It's better, I think, to do that with one's mind, that there's more control that way. I don't know.Shekinah wrote:Also keep in mind the power of a Sigil when considering a tattoo. Is the concept imparted by a particular piece of art what you really want influencing your astral body, aura and health?
Actually the CIA allows tattoos:Shekinah wrote:Not a problem for most people. Just forwarding a heads up for some. There are many occupations that will not consider anyone with a tattoo for some positions and the CIA screening guidelines do consider it a character defect.(Why? because that decision was highly influenced by social encouragement and a need for peer acceptance. You are less likely to dance to the beat of your own drum) Today's military are having difficulty recruiting so they are much more lenient. Even so, in the military a tattoo is not wise in Special Operations or black programs where foreign intelligence may be tracking you. They serve no function beyond body art. It can be used to identify an individual and from a distance is an infrared and starlight signature. In burn wounds we often see deeper tissue damage throughout a tattoo.
While working with a Dermatology practice I have removed a few with laser and it is expensive and traumatic and most always leaves residual scar evidence even when the newer erasable inks have been used. So why do it? vanity? to be one of the crowd? to make a statement? Of course folks are free to do with their body as they will. There are more negative then positive connotations to body art. Money best invested in your IRA. What if....you become a hostage in an ISIS terrorist event. They will certainly love seeing a pentagram on a person and will no doubt have special treatment in mind. Improbable but possible we cannot know everything the future holds.
Lady_Lilith wrote:Actually the CIA allows tattoos:Shekinah wrote:Not a problem for most people. Just forwarding a heads up for some. There are many occupations that will not consider anyone with a tattoo for some positions and the CIA screening guidelines do consider it a character defect.(Why? because that decision was highly influenced by social encouragement and a need for peer acceptance. You are less likely to dance to the beat of your own drum) Today's military are having difficulty recruiting so they are much more lenient. Even so, in the military a tattoo is not wise in Special Operations or black programs where foreign intelligence may be tracking you. They serve no function beyond body art. It can be used to identify an individual and from a distance is an infrared and starlight signature. In burn wounds we often see deeper tissue damage throughout a tattoo.
https://www.cia.gov/careers/faq
While working with a Dermatology practice I have removed a few with laser and it is expensive and traumatic and most always leaves residual scar evidence even when the newer erasable inks have been used. So why do it? vanity? to be one of the crowd? to make a statement? Of course folks are free to do with their body as they will. There are more negative then positive connotations to body art. Money best invested in your IRA. What if....you become a hostage in an ISIS terrorist event. They will certainly love seeing a pentagram on a person and will no doubt have special treatment in mind. Improbable but possible we cannot know everything the future holds.
Kidnapped by ISIS?! Really man???
I have to completely disagree with you on this point. Most folks I know with impressive intentional markings are doing it to empower themselves, and these people definitely are NOT followers but do dance to the rhythm of their own drum. They have not rushed out in a drunken blur to get tats with their messed up friends, but rather they are highly creative energetic and caring folks. It's irresponsible to make a blanket statement. One could have absolutely no idea what kind of a person gets a tattoo. Sure some are followers, but not all.Shekinah wrote:because that decision was highly influenced by social encouragement and a need for peer acceptance. You are less likely to dance to the beat of your own drum